<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gauson &#187; Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gauson.com/blog/tag/website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gauson.com</link>
	<description>Expressing Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Which CMS is the best?</title>
		<link>http://www.gauson.com/blog/2009/01/29/which-cms-is-the-best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gauson.com/blog/2009/01/29/which-cms-is-the-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G' Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drupal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joomla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gauson.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a large number of open source content management systems available to enable you to create and manage your website effortlessly. All of them offer different functionalities and tools for easy use. The two popular CMS I have chosen to cover here are Joomla and Drupal. They are free to download and use. Each [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a large number of <strong>open source content management systems</strong> available to enable you to create and manage your website effortlessly.  All of them offer different functionalities  and tools for easy use. The two popular CMS I have chosen to cover here are <strong>Joomla</strong> and <strong>Drupal</strong>. They are <em>free to  download </em>and use. Each CMS has their own pros and cons and it really  depends on what type of website you are creating and how experienced you  are.</p>
<p><strong>Let’s  start with Joomla first.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Joomla</strong> is  designed to work well in shared hosting packages. The look of <strong>Joomla</strong>’s installer looks much the same  like the installers used for common desktop software, as well as the  administrative interface that content editors use. There are a small number of  entry barriers when using <strong>Joomla</strong> and  it should take little time for website developers to get familiar with the  system. If you need extensions to cater for your website and that are not  available at extensions.joomla.org, it would not be too expensive for you to  get a programmer  to design one for you  as <strong>Joomla</strong> is written in PHP, which  is a widely recognized script language specifically designed for website  development.<br />
<span id="more-82"></span><br />
<strong>Joomla</strong> can  be a fantastic choice to build a professional website with lots of pages,  content types such as events and news items and strong navigation.  Unfortunately, it has limited functionality when it comes to dynamic content  structures. One example is the website navigation is only allowed no more than  two levels of hierarchy, and you can only link one page to another based on  free-form page tags, rather than more accurate metadata and rules.<br />
I have taken ideas from a  few websites to help list the pros and cons of <strong>Joomla</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Pros  of Joomla</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Easy deployment</li>
<li>Large community       of developers (more than <strong>Drupal</strong>)       for helping with setup and development</li>
<li>Multi-lingual.       Translation and language support in modules. Works most of the time.</li>
<li>More intuitive       administration user interface</li>
<li>Editing content       is simple</li>
<li>Lots of polished       modules for things like calendars, polls, etc.</li>
<li>Easy addition of       modules. Good modules that works as advertised and have many options,       supported by the authors, commercial or not. Lots and lots of modules,       professional ones too. Modules for most everything.</li>
<li>Versioning is       available</li>
<li>Most of the most       popular modules and <strong>Joomla</strong> itself, is bug-free. Ok, there might be a few work-arounds needed, but you       can mostly work around them, or maybe you just misunderstood something.</li>
<li>There is SEF and       SEO, alas not as good as Drupals, it works and you don’t need too many       modules for something decent</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons of Joomla</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>1 installation       of the software gives you 1 website</li>
<li>Modules cost you       money</li>
<li>Limited roles       and permission allowances</li>
<li>Categories can       only go two levels deep</li>
<li>Out-of-the-box       blogging functionality is mediocre</li>
<li>URLs are not       search engine friendly (there is a purchasable module)</li>
</ul>
<p>Ok let’s move on to <strong>Drupal</strong>. Now <strong>Drupal</strong>, like <strong>Joomla</strong> will  work well in a shared hosting package. It is easy to get started like <strong>Joomla</strong> but it will not be as easy a  set-up compared to <strong>Joomla</strong> but if you  are technically savvy, you should not have too much trouble there.<br />
<strong>Drupal</strong> has  many great and extensive tools for content editors or developers to design  websites without the hassles of going into the code and offers accessible  standards-compliant pages. Its workflow makes it simple for developers that  need multi-level approval processes. In addition to that, <strong>Drupal</strong> offers deeply integrated plug-ins for incorporating other  specialist tools.</p>
<p><strong> Pros of Drupal</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Easy deployment</li>
<li>Editing tabs       integrated into actual pages</li>
<li>By far <strong>Drupal</strong>’s strongest feature is its       category structure known as taxonomy. This is whereby Multiple levels of       categories are allowed along with an easily integrated tagging system</li>
<li>Modules are       plentiful, free, and suitable for non-profits</li>
<li>Human readable       URLs which are search engine friendly</li>
<li>1 installation       allows you to create and manage multiple websites (very handy when       creating campaign sites)</li>
<li>Highly       configurable user permissions handling</li>
<li>Editing content       is simple as well</li>
<li>Very flexible in       its configuration</li>
<li>Many high       profile sites use <strong>Drupal</strong> (e.g.:       MTV UK, BBC, the Onion, Nasa, Greenpeace UK, Kleercut )</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons of Drupal</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Administration       area is clunky, but it&#8217;s getting better with each version</li>
<li>Support for the       free modules can be frustrating</li>
<li>Adding a visual       theme to <strong>Drupal</strong> can be time       consuming</li>
<li>Terminology in       the administration can be cryptic</li>
</ul>
<p>So finally the decision  comes down to which one will you choose? It really depends on your website. If  you are looking for an easy to use content management system to manage your  content, I would suggest <strong>Joomla</strong>. If  it is a community building website where you require integrated and extensive  tools, then go with <strong>Drupal</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gauson.com/blog/2009/01/29/which-cms-is-the-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
